�����

In a Washington Post article published on June 22, University of Virginia Professor James Ceaser took on the abrupt decision by his university's Board of Visitors to fire President Teresa Sullivan by invoking the name of the school's founder, Thomas Jefferson, and his vision for liberal education:

"What has been lost in the secrecy surrounding the board's actions is any understanding of the educational issues at stake. News reports indicate that the board identified departments such as German and classics as a drain on resources, making them candidates for the chopping block. If true (so far the board has denied that it is), Jefferson would have argued against such cuts. He considered the study of Latin, Greek and Hebrew, as well as German, to be an essential component of the university's curriculum. And he insisted on an education that 'generates habits of application, of order, and the love of virtue.' There are financial bottom lines, and then there are academic ones."

What does the crisis at the University of Virginia teach us about the nature of liberal education in America today? Is the university properly subject to business principles like "strategic dynamism," invoked by some of the regents as they sought to remove Sullivan? How do we balance financial and academic bottom lines?

Required Reading

James W. Ceaser, The Washington Post, June 22, 2012.

Anne D. Neal, The Washington Post, June 23, 2012.