SVG
Commentary
Weekly Standard Online

Lebanon's Garbage Politics

Former Senior Fellow
Lebanese protesters clash with security forces during a demonstration against the ongoing trash crisis in Beirut, August 22, 2015. (ANWAR AMRO/AFP/Getty Images)
Caption
Lebanese protesters clash with security forces during a demonstration against the ongoing trash crisis in Beirut, August 22, 2015. (ANWAR AMRO/AFP/Getty Images)

Over the weekend, thousands of Lebanese took to the streets to protest against their country鈥檚 corrupt political culture. The immediate cause of their concern, and anger, is that the country鈥檚 garbage has not been collected for a month and has come to pose, as Lebanon鈥檚 health minister , a 鈥渉ealth disaster.鈥� More generally then, the protests were directed at Lebanon鈥檚 political class and most of the country鈥檚 leadership, including Even after the violence that killed one demonstrator and injured many more, some observers are now hopeful that this growing protest movement (aptly named 鈥淵ou Stink鈥�) might kick off a genuine revolution against the Lebanese political system and bring real democracy to the jewel of the Levant.

Tragically, this is not the case. In reality, the 鈥淵ou Stink鈥� movement is conclusive evidence that for the majority of Lebanese, law-abiding and freedom-loving, their situation is hopeless.

The protests against Lebanon鈥檚 political class began in earnest and were quickly overtaken by proxy forces acting on behalf of a few very prominent members of that political class. show the political affiliations of the thugs sent to the streets to cause mayhem鈥攖attoos and other markers them as members or allies of Hezbollah and Amal, the party of God鈥檚 sometime Shiite partner and frequent rival for communal favor. Some are saying that followers of Hezbollah鈥檚 Christian ally Michel Aoun joined Hezbollah and Amal to attack the army and security forces, who then escalated by opening fire鈥攔ubber bullets and also it seems live ammunition鈥攐n unarmed civilians. Hence the protest organizers, fearing more bloodshed, have decided to postpone future demonstrations, at least for the time being.

In the aftermath, it鈥檚 hard to piece together exactly what happened. Why for instance would Hezbollah send its followers to the streets to attack an army that it controls and has enlisted in its sectarian war against Sunni fighters? Some that Hezbollah wants to the government, or that it wants to block certain political appointments. Other interpretations are even more elaborate: some are saying, for instance, that Aoun is mad at Amal chief Nabih Berri because he openly rejected Aoun鈥檚 presidential bid. Then Aoun went after the army because the commander of the Lebanese Armed Forces hates him, and he hates him in exchange. Hezbollah lent some token support to Aoun because鈥攚ell, why not? It costs them nothing because they know that it鈥檚 irrelevant.

In other words, it doesn鈥檛 really matter why thugs were sent because, well, that鈥檚 Lebanese politics鈥攑etty and pathetic. Which is to say that the premise of 鈥淵ou Stink鈥� is right on the mark: Lebanon鈥檚 political class is venal and corrupt and that鈥檚 why they regularly put innocent Lebanese in the middle of their mafia feuds.

But the other reason that it doesn鈥檛 really matter is because the premise of the 鈥淵ou Stink鈥� movement is missing the point entirely, because the real problem with Lebanon isn鈥檛 the country鈥檚 craven politicians. Indeed, it was the 800-lb. gorilla himself who reminded everyone last weekend that the real problem with the country is the well-armed terrorist organization that serves as Iran鈥檚 praetorian guard on the eastern Mediterranean. The problem is Hezbollah. Everything else pales in comparison.

When critics of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action explain that Iran will use the cash windfall from its multi-billion dollar signing bonus to its allies, we tend to emphasize that the money will buy more weapons for Iran鈥檚 regional proxies. That鈥檚 of course true, but in the case of Hezbollah, the money will also be lavished on a Shiite constituency that is very anxious about its central role in the Syrian conflict.

It鈥檚 true that some Shiites fear that Hezbollah鈥檚 involvement in the Syrian war, its central role in the murder of hundreds of thousands of Sunnis, has stirred up vicious sectarian feelings, but there鈥檚 another reason they鈥檙e worried. After Hezbollah fought Israel in 2006, the money started rolling in (from Iran as well as Gulf states, Europe and even the United States) to rebuild destroyed Shiite areas and Hezbollah got rich. And then lots of people around the party also saw their standard of living improve鈥攃ars, houses, clothes, etc. The lesson that some drew was that war was cost-free鈥攊ndeed, it was a profitable investment! Many of Hassan Nasrallah鈥檚 followers believed him when he called thousands of casualties and billions of dollars of damage a 鈥渄ivine victory鈥� because it followed the logic of the most fundamental fact of warfare鈥攎oney flows not to those who lose wars but to those who win them. Hezbollah must have won because it got paid.

The fact that Hezbollah has had to cut back on services as the organization fights in Syria is demoralizing. Iranian leadership boasts of belt-tightening鈥攖hey call it a 鈥渞esistance economy鈥濃攂ut they鈥檙e not on the front lines of the Syrian war like Hezbollah is. Now the JCPOA comes as evidence that Hezbollah鈥檚 steadfast resistance paid off. Nasrallah will use that shower of Iranian money to build a rainbow and show his followers that they鈥檙e on the winning side. Their blood bought wealth. And soon they will be under the protection of an Iranian nuclear weapon. And then the Sunni Arab states will acquire a bomb and that鈥檚 when the fighting will turn really bad, especially for the Shiites because they are outnumbered.

In the meantime, Israeli officials are worried that the cash flow may tempt a newly reinvigorated Hezbollah to try something foolish, even as it鈥檚 still bleeding badly on the Syrian front. This conflict, as Israeli officials have explained, will almost surely engulf all of Lebanon because Hezbollah has spread its enormous arsenal throughout the country. Seen in this context, the 鈥淵ou Stink鈥� movement is a coping mechanism that suggests to the Lebanese there are practical steps they can take to solve their problems. But they can鈥檛 because the central problem for Lebanon is the terrorist group with 100,000 missiles pointed at an enemy who does not believe that the problem with Lebanon is garbage collection and corrupt politicians.

It鈥檚 hard not to sympathize with the Lebanese because their situation is tragic. Even if they do see that the fundamental problem with Lebanon right now is Hezbollah, there鈥檚 little they can do about it, except to make war. 鈥淯nderstandably, they have no wish to return to the horrors of the civil war years,鈥� says Tony Badran, research fellow at Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 鈥淔or those Lebanese too young to recall that fratricidal conflict, they can look at Syria today to see what鈥檚 likely in store. And yet, even if they do not make war against Hezbollah, war is going to come for the Lebanese anyway鈥攊f not with Israel, then as a spillover from the Syrian conflict. They鈥檙e making war against all their neighbors, and they鈥檙e the weakest of them all.鈥�

In other words, there are no good choices for Lebanon. And this is what the 鈥淵ou Stink鈥� movement is really about鈥攊t is a gesture representing the inability of nearly 4 million people to avoid a catastrophe. It鈥檚 about a man whose foot is nailed to the floor and who walks in a small circle even as he tells himself everything is normal, that he is walking to the store, walking to the beach, walking his children to school. The 鈥淵ou Stink鈥� movement is about something tragic鈥攊t鈥檚 about a country where people have no control over their lives. After all, if most Lebanese have to deal with the fact of Hezbollah, the party of God answers to Iran鈥攁nd when the regime in Tehran sends them to their deaths, they will go and die and take down the rest of Lebanon, too. This is the saddest country in the world.